Nate • 7 June 2025

Nate • 7 June 2025

Xactimate vs. Restoration Contractors

When it comes to repairing property damage, whether from fire, water, or storms, accurate cost estimates are crucial for homeowners, contractors, and insurance companies. Two primary methods dominate the industry: Xactimate estimates, a software-driven approach widely used by insurance adjusters, and estimates prepared by restoration contractors, which rely on hands-on expertise and subcontractor bids. Understanding the differences between these approaches can help property owners navigate insurance claims and ensure fair settlements. In this article, we’ll compare Xactimate estimates and restoration contractor estimates, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and key considerations for achieving accurate repair cost estimates.

 

What is Xactimate?

Xactimate is an industry-standard software developed by Xactware (a Verisk Analytics company) used primarily by insurance adjusters, contractors, and restoration professionals to estimate repair and reconstruction costs. It provides a detailed, itemized breakdown of materials, labor, and other expenses based on a comprehensive database updated regularly with pricing specific to geographic regions (down to zip codes across the U.S.). Xactimate is widely adopted, with 80% of property claims in the U.S. and Canada estimated using this software.

Key Features of Xactimate:

  • Localized Pricing: Uses zip-code-based pricing for materials, labor, and equipment, ensuring region-specific accuracy.
  • Automation and Templates: Streamlines the estimation process with pre-built templates, cloud-based access, and tools like Sketch AR for creating diagrams.
  • Standardization: Provides consistent, detailed reports that align with insurance industry standards, reducing disputes during claims.
  • Real-Time Updates: Pricing data is updated monthly, reflecting current market conditions and material costs.

Xactimate is particularly effective for standardized projects, such as tract homes or common repair tasks like drywall replacement or water extraction. However, its reliance on averages and pre-set data can pose challenges for unique or high-value properties.

 

What Are Restoration Contractor Estimates?

Restoration contractor estimates are prepared by licensed professionals who rely on their industry expertise, subcontractor bids, and real-world project experience to assess repair costs. Unlike Xactimate, which uses software-driven calculations, contractor estimates are often tailored to the specific project, factoring in local labor rates, material availability, and the complexity of the damage.

Key Features of Contractor Estimates:

  • Customized Assessments: Contractors physically inspect the property and account for unique features, such as custom-built cabinetry or historic materials, which may not be adequately captured in Xactimate’s database.
  • Subcontractor Bids: Estimates often incorporate quotes from specialized subcontractors (e.g., electricians, plumbers), providing a more granular cost breakdown.
  • Market-Driven Pricing: Reflects actual costs based on current local market conditions, which may differ from Xactimate’s averaged data.
  • Flexibility: Contractors can adjust estimates to account for unforeseen challenges, such as hidden structural damage discovered during repairs.

Contractor estimates are particularly valuable for complex or custom projects, where standardized software may fall short. However, they may lack the uniformity and detailed documentation that insurance companies prefer, which can complicate claim negotiations.

 

Comparing Xactimate Estimates and Restoration Contractor Estimates

To help property owners and professionals choose the right approach, let’s break down the key differences between Xactimate and restoration contractor estimates across several critical factors.

1. Accuracy for Unique or High-Value Properties

  • Xactimate: While Xactimate excels at estimating costs for standard homes, it may underestimate costs for custom-built, historic, or high-value properties. Its database is designed for typical scenarios and may not account for premium materials or specialized labor. For example, replacing custom kitchen cabinets may be undervalued if Xactimate applies generic pricing.
  • Contractor Estimates: Restoration contractors provide more accurate estimates for unique properties by factoring in specific materials, craftsmanship, and local market conditions. For instance, a contractor estimating a high-end kitchen renovation might include bids from cabinet makers who specialize in custom designs, ensuring a realistic cost projection.

Winner: Contractor estimates for unique or high-value properties; Xactimate for standard homes.

2. Speed and Efficiency

  • Xactimate: Xactimate’s automation tools, cloud-based platform, and pre-built templates allow for rapid estimate generation, often within 24-48 hours. This speed is critical for insurance claims, where quick turnaround times can expedite settlements.
  • Contractor Estimates: Contractor estimates typically take longer, as they involve on-site inspections, subcontractor coordination, and manual calculations. Depending on the project’s complexity, estimates may take several days or more to finalize.

Winner: Xactimate for speed and efficiency.

3. Standardization and Insurance Compatibility

  • Xactimate: As the gold standard for insurance claims, Xactimate estimates are formatted to meet industry expectations, making them easier to negotiate with adjusters. Insurance companies like State Farm, Allstate, and USAA rely on Xactimate, and its standardized reports reduce discrepancies during claim reviews.
  • Contractor Estimates: Contractor estimates may not align with Xactimate’s format or level of detail, which can create challenges when presenting them to insurance adjusters. Property owners may need to provide additional documentation or hire Xactimate-trained professionals to bridge the gap.

Winner: Xactimate for insurance compatibility.

4. Cost Transparency and Documentation

  • Xactimate: Offers detailed, itemized reports that break down costs by line item (e.g., drywall replacement, labor hours). These reports are transparent and include overhead, profit, and taxes, making it easier for stakeholders to understand the estimate. Xactimate’s documentation is also valuable for resolving disputes.
  • Contractor Estimates: While contractors can provide detailed breakdowns, the level of documentation varies. Some contractors may offer less granular reports, which can lead to misunderstandings with insurance adjusters or clients.

Winner: Xactimate for transparency and documentation.

5. Flexibility for Custom Pricing

  • Xactimate: Allows for custom pricing to account for specific materials or regional variations, but this requires expertise to override default settings accurately. Without proper training, adjusters or contractors may rely on outdated or generic pricing, leading to lowball estimates.
  • Contractor Estimates: Contractors have greater flexibility to adjust pricing based on real-world costs, such as sourcing high-end materials or accounting for labor shortages. This adaptability ensures estimates reflect the true scope of work.

Winner: Contractor estimates for flexibility.

6. Potential for Disputes

  • Xactimate: Because Xactimate is widely used, it reduces disputes by providing a common framework for adjusters and contractors. However, improper use or reliance on averages can lead to underestimation, sparking disagreements, especially for complex claims.
  • Contractor Estimates: Contractor estimates may differ significantly from Xactimate estimates, leading to disputes with insurance companies. Property owners may need to advocate strongly or hire Xactimate-trained professionals to reconcile differences.

Winner: Xactimate for reducing disputes, but only when used correctly.

 

Bridging the Gap: Best Practices for Property Owners

To ensure fair and accurate repair cost estimates, property owners can combine the strengths of both approaches. Here are some actionable tips:

  1. Obtain Independent Estimates: Hire a licensed restoration contractor trained in Xactimate to provide an independent estimate. This professional can use Xactimate to align with insurance standards while incorporating real-world expertise for accuracy.
  2. Document Everything: Provide detailed documentation of your property’s features, such as receipts for custom upgrades or photos of high-end finishes. This helps contractors and Xactimate estimators account for unique elements.
  3. Compare Estimates: Request both a Xactimate estimate and a contractor estimate, then compare them to identify discrepancies. A professional estimator can explain differences and negotiate with the insurance company on your behalf.
  4. Check for Market Conditions: Ensure estimates account for local market conditions, such as labor shortages or material price surges after a disaster. Xactimate allows for market condition adjustments, but contractors may naturally reflect these in their bids.
  5. Work with Certified Professionals: Choose contractors or estimators with certifications from organizations like the Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC) or Xactimate training to ensure credibility.

 

Conclusion: Which Approach is Right for You?

Choosing between Xactimate estimates and restoration contractor estimates depends on your project’s needs and complexity. Xactimate is ideal for standard repairs, offering speed, standardization, and insurance compatibility. However, it may fall short for custom or high-value properties, where restoration contractor estimates shine due to their flexibility and real-world accuracy. For the best outcome, consider combining both approaches by working with a Xactimate-trained contractor who can provide a tailored estimate that aligns with insurance expectations.

By understanding the strengths and limitations of each method, property owners can advocate for fair claim settlements and ensure their repairs are completed accurately and efficiently. Whether you’re a homeowner, contractor, or adjuster, leveraging the right tools and expertise is key to navigating the complex world of construction cost repair estimates.

by Nate 4 November 2025
Project Overview The subject of our case study is a two-story wood-framed residential condominium, equipped with a variety of exterior claddings such as stone veneer, stucco, wood panel siding, and wood trim. The structure features flange-mounted metal-clad windows and a combination of standing seam metal, flat roofs covered with TPO, and concrete tile roofing. Following exterior cladding repairs and a flat roof replacement in 2021, the building encountered water damage issues, which we will explore in this case study. Incident Report In the winter of 2022, the owner of a condominium suite reported water damage within their unit. A subsequent report by the Community Manager detailed the water loss and remedial actions that had been implemented. Notably, inspections conducted by a roofing company, and other service providers, indicated that recent (2021) cladding and roofing work, performed on the exterior of the building was not the source of the leaks, and that the inspections were inconclusive, but recommended replacing the concrete tile roofing system above the bedroom where the water stains in the ceiling were present. Investigation Findings Construction Science Forensics (CSF) investigation revealed moisture staining on the ceilings of two bedrooms. The stains, though dry during the visit, suggested condensation issues near exhaust vents and roof edges. A flood test and invasive inspection ruled out active leaks from the exterior cladding and roofing systems. CSF performed a preliminary test of the bathroom exhaust fans and clothes dryer exhaust systems. When the clothes dryer was turned on, CSF observed that the dryer fan was overpowering the bathroom exhaust fans. Refer to photograph. This condition is causing warm moist air from the dryer exhaust to be drawn back into the condominium through the bathroom exhaust vents at the roof outlets. The warm moist air is then converted to liquid water in the form of condensation within the exhaust ducts above the 1st floor bedroom. The homeowners reported that there were intermittent leaks in the ceiling of the cupola section of the condominium above the stairwell. CSF observed that there was a master bedroom exhaust duct and vent directly above this area. CSF observed that the backdraft damper (flapper) was stuck shut by a bent exterior bird screen. This condition will contribute to condensation and water within the exhaust duct that will leak into the attic, and condense on cold surfaces. Key Observations Master Bedroom Ceiling: Staining adjacent to a bathroom exhaust vent, caused by condensation around the bathroom exhaust duct. 1st Floor Bedroom Ceiling: Staining near the roof edge, believed to be due to condensation within the bathroom exhaust duct systems. Reverse Airflow Issue: The clothes dryer was overpowering bathroom exhaust fans, leading to cold air being drawn from the exterior into the interior through the bathroom exhaust duct, causing condensation within and around the exhaust ducts. Cupola Section Leaks: A stuck backdraft damper and improperly sealed ductwork contributing to condensation within the exhaust ducts, which originally appeared to be a roof leak. Recommendations CSF recommended addressing the condensation issues by ensuring proper ventilation within the attic spaces, and exhaust systems. Installation of a passive make up air supply to neutralize the negative pressure from the clothes dryer. Additionally, CSF recommended conducting testing and balancing of the HVAC system wholistically to account for building pressurization changes caused by the fireplace flu, the clothes dryer, and the multiple exhaust fans (Kitchen, bathrooms, laundry room). Conclusion This case study highlights the importance of thorough inspections and the complexities of diagnosing water damage in residential buildings. It underscores the need for proper maintenance and the potential impact of overlooked details such as exhaust system balance and ductwork integrity. Here are a few additional considerations that might be useful when dealing with water damage in buildings: Actionable Insights: · -Facility Managers: Add exhaust CFM testing to your PM checklist. · -Contractors: Verify dryer + bath fan balance before final sign-off. · -HOA Boards: Budget for building pressurization audits every 3–5 years. Bonus: 5 Condensation Prevention Tips: · 1. Inspect Exhaust Terminations Annually – Clear bird screens, check dampers. · 2. Insulate Ducts in Unconditioned Spaces – Stop cold-surface condensation. · 3. Balance CFM Across Appliances – Dryers shouldn’t dominate bath fans. · 4. Monitor Indoor Humidity (40–50% RH) – Use dehumidifiers in winter. 5. Hire Building Science Experts Early – Avoid costly misdiagnosis.
by Nate 15 May 2025
Water loss and building failure claims are significant challenges for property owners, often leading to high costs and emotional stress. Construction forensic experts play a crucial role in investigating these claims, ensuring transparency and cost control, in contrast to standard mitigation contractors who may cause unnecessary damage and inflated repair costs.
by Nate 13 May 2025
The blog post discusses the wetting and drying processes of wood in construction, focusing on adsorption, absorption, and desorption rates, moisture content requirements for various materials, and building code standards for drying materials before covering. Key points include: - **Wetting and Drying of Wood**: Wood undergoes wetting (absorbing water) and drying (evaporating water) cycles during construction, influenced by wood type, environmental conditions, and moisture content. - **Adsorption, Absorption, Desorption**: Adsorption involves molecules adhering to a surface, absorption is mass transfer into a material, and desorption is the release of these substances, with rates depending on temperature, pressure, and material properties. - **Moisture Content Requirements**: Materials like concrete, insulation, drywall (5-12% moisture), plywood/OSB (≤19%), and gypsum sheathing/gypcrete (≤1-5%) have specific moisture thresholds for optimal performance. - **Code Requirements**: Building codes mandate drying ma
by Nate 13 May 2025
This case study explores the challenges and failures of Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) HVAC systems in high-rise condominiums. It emphasizes the importance of following industry standards, manufacturers’ installation guidelines, and proper maintenance schedules to prevent issues. The study highlights key industry regulations from AHRI and ASHRAE, as well as installation requirements set by major manufacturers. Regular maintenance, including quarterly or semiannual checkups, is identified as essential for optimal system performance. Common site observations reveal installation flaws such as missing inverted oil traps, inadequate piping support, and poor insulation, all of which can lead to inefficiencies and failures. The design of VRF system piping is crucial for efficiency and longevity, requiring proper sizing, expansion loops, oil traps, and as-built documentation. The consequences of inadequate piping support range from leaks and misalignment to corrosion and catastrophic failures.
by Nate 13 May 2025
This case study explores the use of advanced 3D technology for deviation analysis in construction, focusing on an easement agreement between two property owners. The agreement required the hotel developer to restore any damage caused to the existing building during construction. To assess deviations, experts utilized 3D digital twins, laser scanning, drone photography, crack gauges, and floor level manometer surveys. These tools provided precise measurements and visualizations to track structural shifts and foundation movements. The findings pinpointed areas of damage, allowing the building owner to present clear evidence to the hotel developer. As a result, the developer agreed to cover the necessary repairs. The study highlights the importance of technology in enforcing easement agreements and maintaining structural integrity. It also demonstrates how digital twins and laser scanning can revolutionize construction analysis, ensuring safer and more resilient buildings.
by Nate 13 May 2025
This article explores the impact of air leakage and condensation on building performance, emphasizing the need for energy-efficient and durable structures. Air leaks contribute to energy loss and moisture-related issues, making proper sealing crucial. Dew point analysis helps predict condensation risks, preventing mold and structural decay. Managing humidity levels indoors and outdoors ensures comfort and prevents condensation buildup. Thermal bridging—where heat bypasses insulation—can lead to energy inefficiencies and moisture problems, requiring continuous insulation to mitigate its effects. Decoupling wall assemblies from attic and parapet structures further reduces air leakage and moisture transfer, improving energy performance. Additional strategies like building envelope commissioning, balanced ventilation systems, climate-responsive design, and thermal imaging enhance building durability. Proper material selection, regular maintenance, and occupant awareness also play vital roles in minimizing air lea
by Nate 13 May 2025
This case study investigates the hygrothermal issues of a five-story apartment complex in the Pacific Northwest, focusing on moisture management challenges and their implications. Hygrothermal Challenges: The study identifies persistent water leaks around windows and wall penetrations as primary issues affecting the building's moisture management. 1 Methodology: Data logging of interior temperature and humidity, analysis of historical weather data, and pressure testing were employed to understand the environmental conditions impacting the buildings. 2 3 Findings: Key findings include inadequate sealing at window junctures, damaged exterior sheathing, and occupant moisture loading exceeding the wall assembly's drying capacity. 4 5 Discussion: The analysis reveals that the interplay between building design, occupant-generated moisture, and environmental factors contributed to the moisture issues, highlighting the need for effective humidity management. 6 Consequences: Prolonged moisture exposure
by Nate 13 May 2025
This article highlights the importance of the Building Envelope Reference Manual (BERM) in construction planning. The building envelope plays a crucial role in energy efficiency, structural integrity, and occupant comfort, making proper design and maintenance essential. BERM provides best practices for selecting materials, construction techniques, and climate adaptation strategies to ensure durability and resilience. It also aligns with sustainability standards, helping professionals create energy-efficient and eco-friendly buildings. By using BERM, architects, engineers, contractors, and building owners can collaborate effectively to meet high-performance standards while avoiding costly errors. As the construction industry evolves, BERM remains a vital resource for ensuring long-lasting, well-designed structures.
by Nate 11 May 2025
This document discusses the roles and differences between general contractors and specialty contractors in construction projects, emphasizing their unique contributions and challenges, as well as the importance of forensic experts in resolving disputes. General Contractors Overview: General contractors manage entire construction projects, coordinating schedules, budgets, and subcontractors while ensuring compliance with regulations. They provide holistic oversight but may lack specialized expertise, leading to higher management fees. 1 2 Specialty Contractors Role: Specialty contractors focus on specific trades, offering deep expertise in areas like plumbing or electrical work. They are cost-effective for targeted tasks but may create coordination issues if multiple specialists are involved. 3 4 Choosing the Right Contractor: The choice between general and specialty contractors depends on project scope, budget, and risk tolerance.